image is taken in courtesy of :http://www.gosocialmarketing.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/social-media-.jpg
These days,
the internet is fast becoming the golden era of politics. Many citizens turn to
the internet to keep themselves updated with the latest news and information.
The internet has also made it possible for citizens to engage in healthy
debates and the exchange of political views with other citizens. Viewing this
phenomenon from a communication theorist perspective, the internet has indeed
allowed multi-directional communication to take place effortlessly. Citizens no longer
need to rely on print media—newspapers and magazines—to keep them updated for
the latest news. News on the internet is fast, immediate and more engaging in
comparison to individual news reading.
Internet, a direct lever
for democracy
With
globalization, the internet has become the direct lever for democracy. Many politicians have recognized the
importance of the internet as a social lever for encouraging political
participation among the masses. It is increasingly evident that more
politicians are taking governance and politicking to a new level by using the internet
as a medium for advocating political campaigns and new policies.
A common
example used by the media is the 2008 USA Presidential Elections. While President
Obama’s success in the campaign is largely attributed to his eloquence,
persuasiveness and intelligence, there is no denial that his involvement in
politics through the use of social media platforms, especially twitter, played
a huge role in his victory. Likewise, many leaders today are embracing
technology and the internet to convey political sentiments and outreach to the
masses.
In local
context, more leaders are using social media platforms to connect with their fellow
citizens. Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and several MPs have set up official Facebook
pages for easy dissemination of information. Using social media and the
internet does not only make it more accessible for the politicians to broadcast
information directly to it citizens. It also makes it easier for citizens to
communicate and raise their views to a particular political party.
Using the internet as a
tool for political polarization
While the
internet has its advantages of bringing the masses together to participate in sociopolitical
activities, it is difficult to assume that there would be greater political
stability as a result of politicians’ involvement in the internet and social
media activities. Due to its ubiquitous nature, the internet has allowed users
to post and view information anonymously. Users can easily make derogatory
remarks and give unsupportive feedback which may go against the motives of
political leaders. Although media literate individuals believe that such
actions promote open-mindedness and diversity in communication, this can also
be perceived as a threat to political unity within a country.
The 2011
General Elections has demonstrated that the new media—blogs, social networking
sites and micro-blogging sites—have an unintended effects when citizens engage
in internet-related activities to provide alternative voices about the social
issue plaguing the Island. The result of this proved to be devastating to the
dominant political party when as countless of citizens took the opportunity to declare
their support for other alternative parties. This example is sufficient to
illustrate how the internet can promote political division among dominant
parties and advocate polarizing ideologies.
No comments:
Post a Comment